Manager Surface vs Traditional IDEs: Orchestrating AI Agents
Google Antigravity introduces the Manager Surface (a revolutionary interface where you manage AI agents instead of writing code. Learn how multi-agent orchestration changes everything.

If Gemini 3 is the engine, Google Antigravity is the chassis. It's not just another IDE with AI bolted on as a plugin. It's a completely reimagined development environment built from the ground up for one purpose:
Orchestrating autonomous AI agents.Traditional IDEs are designed for humans who write code. Antigravity is designed for humans who manage agents that write code.
Let's explore how this fundamental shift changes everything.
The Bifurcated Interface: Two Modes, One Purpose
Antigravity introduces a dual-interface design that supports the transition from "coder" to "manager."
1. The Editor View: Familiar Territory
This remains a VS Code-like environment with:
- Syntax highlighting
- File tree navigation
- Integrated terminal
- Git integration
- Debugging tools
When to use: Manual code review, debugging complex logic, fine-tuning generated code.
2. The Manager Surface: The Innovation
This is the platform's defining feature (a "Mission Control" for AI agents.
Instead of the agent existing as a chat window inside the editor, the editor is conceptually a tool used by the agent.
How the Manager Surface Works
| Traditional IDE | Antigravity Manager Surface |
|---|---|
| You write code with AI suggestions | You assign tasks to AI agents |
| One chat assistant | Multiple specialized agents |
| Sequential: write, test, debug | Parallel: agents work simultaneously |
| You are the worker | You are the manager |
| Chat interface in sidebar | Full orchestration dashboard |
Multi-Agent Orchestration: Your Virtual Team
The Manager Surface allows you to spawn multiple agents and assign them distinct, specialized tasks.
Agent Specialization Patterns
| Agent Type | Responsibility | Example Task |
|---|---|---|
| Architect Agent | System design, scaffolding | "Create a microservices architecture for e-commerce" |
| Feature Agent | Implementation | "Build the shopping cart functionality" |
| Test Agent | QA, test generation | "Write integration tests for payment flow" |
| Refactor Agent | Code optimization | "Refactor authentication module for performance" |
| Documentation Agent | Docs, comments | "Generate API documentation from OpenAPI spec" |
| Security Agent | Vulnerability scanning | "Audit codebase for SQL injection risks" |
Parallelization: The Key Advantage
A single developer can now orchestrate a team of virtual engineers, reviewing their outputs asynchronously as they complete work.
Real-world example:💡 Key Insight: You're not 5x faster because AI generates code faster. You're 5x faster because five agents work simultaneously on different parts of the system.
Artifacts: Solving the Trust Problem
Here's the challenge with autonomous agents: How do you trust that 50 file changes across your codebase are correct without reading every line?
Reading all the code would negate the time savings. This is where Artifacts come in.
What Are Artifacts?
Artifacts are human-readable deliverables that agents generate to prove their work without requiring you to audit raw code.
Instead of showing you JSON tool calls or token streams, agents create:
1. Task Lists
2. Implementation Plans
3. Screenshots and Browser Recordings (The Game-Changer)
Because Antigravity includes a headless Chrome instance, agents can:
- Run your application
- Interact with it (click buttons, fill forms)
- Record a video of the functionality they just built
You can simply watch the 45-second video to verify the feature works (no need to read the 200 lines of CSS and React state management code.
Artifact-Driven Review Workflow
🎯 Strategic Takeaway: Artifacts shift code review from line-by-line auditing to outcome verification: validating the "what" instead of the "how."
Generative UI: Framework-Aware Code Generation
Antigravity isn't just a text generator. It's a UI builder with deep framework awareness.
How It Works
Input: Describe a UI or upload a sketch
Processing: Gemini 3's multimodal capabilities "see" the design requirements
Output: Responsive, accessible code in your chosen framework
Supported Frameworks
| Framework | Language | Use Case | Generated Components |
|---|---|---|---|
| React | TypeScript/JavaScript | Web apps | Components, hooks, context |
| Flutter | Dart | Mobile apps | Widgets, state management |
| Jetpack Compose | Kotlin | Android | Composables, ViewModels |
| SwiftUI | Swift | iOS | Views, observable objects |
| Vue.js | TypeScript/JavaScript | Web apps | Components, composables |
What Gets Baked In (Automatically)
✅ Accessibility Standards
- ARIA labels
- Keyboard navigation
- Screen reader support
- Mobile-first breakpoints
- Flexible layouts
- Touch-friendly interactions
- Material Design (Android)
- Human Interface Guidelines (iOS)
- Custom design tokens (if provided)
Real Example
Prompt:"Create a dashboard with a sidebar navigation, header with search, and a data table showing user analytics. Use Material Design, dark mode support, and make it mobile-responsive."Generated Output:
- React component structure (8 components)
- TypeScript interfaces for data types
- Tailwind CSS classes for styling
- Dark mode theme switcher
- Responsive breakpoints (mobile, tablet, desktop)
- Search functionality with debouncing
- Data table with sorting, filtering, pagination
- ARIA landmarks and labels
Zero-Config API Testing: Integration Made Easy
API integration is a notorious source of friction. Antigravity streamlines this with Zero-Config API Testing, leveraging deep Google Cloud integration.
How It Works
- Automatic Spec Inference
- Generates OpenAPI specifications automatically
- No manual YAML writing required
- Request Generation
- Populates with realistic test data
- Handles authentication automatically
- Dependency Mocking
- Isolated testing without infrastructure
- Predictable test results
- Schema Validation
- Catches breaking changes early
- Ensures type safety across services
Integration with Apidog
Antigravity integrates with Apidog for enhanced API workflows:
Export Specs: What you can do in Apidog:- Generate client SDKs (JavaScript, Python, Go, etc.)
- Create comprehensive test suites
- Monitor API performance
- Share documentation with teams
- ✅ 70% reduction in API-related bugs (early user reports)
- ✅ 3x faster integration testing setup
- ✅ Zero configuration for standard REST APIs
Open Source Component
Google has open-sourced parts of the Antigravity API orchestration layer, allowing:
- Community extensions
- Custom integrations
- Self-hosted options (for sensitive environments)
Model Flexibility: Not Locked to Gemini
In a surprising move, Antigravity supports model switching. You're not locked exclusively to Gemini.
Supported Models
| Model | Provider | Best For | Rate Limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3 Pro | Complex reasoning, multimodal, 1M context | Generous (refreshes every 5 hours) | |
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Anthropic | Documentation, careful reasoning | Limited (refreshes every 5 hours) |
| GPT-OSS | OpenAI | General-purpose coding | Limited (refreshes every 5 hours) |
Why This Matters
Different models have different "personalities" and strengths:
- Gemini 3: Best for "Vibe Coding," multimodal input, large context
- Claude: Excellent for writing clear documentation and careful refactoring
- GPT-OSS: Familiar to many developers, good general-purpose option
This flexibility prevents model lock-in (a common developer pain point. And positions Antigravity as a neutral "command center" for AI development, not just a Gemini delivery mechanism.
The Competitive Landscape: How Does Antigravity Compare?
Let's see how Antigravity stacks up against the current market leaders.
Google Antigravity vs The Field
| Feature | Google Antigravity | Cursor (Pro) | GitHub Copilot | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing (Individual) | Free | $20/month | $10/month | $15/month |
| Pricing (Team, 5 devs) | ~$15-30/mo usage-based | $200/month | $95/month | $150/month |
| Context Window | 1M+ tokens (native) | Limited (RAG/embeddings) | 128K tokens | Enhanced context aware |
| Agent Coordination | Multi-agent orchestration | Single-threaded agent | None (autocomplete only) | Single agent |
| Artifacts/Verification | Videos, screenshots, plans | Text-based only | None | Text-based only |
| Model Choice | Gemini 3, Claude 4.5, GPT | Claude, GPT (via API) | GPT-4 Turbo | Proprietary + GPT |
| Multimodal Input | ✅ Video, image, audio | ⚠️ Image only | ❌ Text only | ⚠️ Image only |
| Framework-Aware UI | ✅ Yes (8+ frameworks) | ⚠️ Partial | ❌ No | ⚠️ Partial |
| Zero-Config API Testing | ✅ Yes (GCP integrated) | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No |
| Open Source Components | ✅ API orchestration layer | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No |
| Best For | GCP/Android devs, agentic workflows | Power users, Claude fans | Enterprise Microsoft shops | Deep context understanding |
Strategic Analysis
Google's Advantage:- Free individual tier removes cost barrier
- 1M context eliminates RAG complexity
- Multi-agent parallelization = 5-10x productivity boost
- GCP integration = seamless cloud deployment
- Platform agnostic (works with AWS, Azure)
- Established user base and community
- Superior UX (currently, but Antigravity is catching up)
- Microsoft enterprise contracts
- Integrated with VS Code (default choice)
- Conservative, reliable autocomplete
- "Realtime Action Awareness" for deep code understanding
- Focus on precision over speed
Platform Availability and Requirements
Supported Platforms
- ✅ macOS (native app)
- ✅ Windows (native app)
- ✅ Linux (native app)
System Requirements
Minimum:- 8GB RAM (inference is cloud-based)
- Modern processor (2015 or later)
- 2GB free disk space
- Internet connection (required)
- 16GB RAM (for running local dev servers)
- SSD storage
- Stable internet (low latency to Google Cloud)
Cloud-Native Processing
Because heavy inference happens in the cloud via Gemini 3, local system requirements are modest compared to running local LLMs.
Future: Google's roadmap includes WebGPU-accelerated local inference for enhanced privacy. This will require:
- Modern GPU (NVIDIA RTX 3060+ or Apple Silicon M1+)
- 16GB+ RAM
- Enhanced privacy for sensitive code
What's Next?
This is Part 2 of our 4-part deep dive into Google Antigravity:
- ✅ Part 1: The Death of the Copilot Era, Gemini 3 and Vibe Coding
- ✅ Part 2: Manager Surface and Agent Orchestration (you are here)
- Part 3: Benchmarks, Security, and the Enterprise Play, ROI analysis and compliance
- Part 4: Strategic Analysis and the Future of Coding, industry implications

Keyur Patel is the founder of AiPromptsX and an AI engineer with extensive experience in prompt engineering, large language models, and AI application development. After years of working with AI systems like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, he created AiPromptsX to share effective prompt patterns and frameworks with the broader community. His mission is to democratize AI prompt engineering and help developers, content creators, and business professionals harness the full potential of AI tools.
Explore Related Frameworks
A.P.E Framework: A Simple Yet Powerful Approach to Effective Prompting
Action, Purpose, Expectation - A powerful methodology for designing effective prompts that maximize AI responses
RACE Framework: Role-Aligned Contextual Expertise
A structured approach to AI prompting that leverages specific roles, actions, context, and expectations to produce highly targeted outputs
R.O.S.E.S Framework: Crafting Prompts for Strategic Decision-Making
Use the R.O.S.E.S framework—Role, Objective, Style, Example, Scenario—to develop prompts that generate comprehensive strategic analysis and decision support.